Sanford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prejudicial effect of unredacted portions of the defendant’s statements about his intoxication did not outweigh their probative value because they explained his condition at the time of the crime and his inability to remember certain aspects of the events surrounding the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-03-21· cited 277×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-12-11· cited 43×
• Bolton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-13· cited 12×
• Cane v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-02-09· cited 9×
• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-06-28· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-01-28· cited 55×
• Fordham v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-02-15· cited 52×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-05-01· cited 49×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-05-17· cited 45×
• Rowe v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-09· cited 38×
• Carroll v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-09-16· cited 33×
• Steverson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-12-14· cited 10×