Supreme Court· 11/10/1952

Sanford v. Kepner

Citations

344 U.S. 13
73 S. Ct. 75
97 L. Ed. 2d 12
1952 U.S. LEXIS 2785
95 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 169
97 L. Ed. 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that this Court had \usurped an administrative function\ in deciding that a license should be issued by the FPC without the conditions attached to it by the agency
holding that this Court had “usurped an administrative function” in deciding that a license should be issued by the FPC without the conditions attached to it by the agency
the lower court intruded on an administrative function in ordering the agency to strike an unlawful section of a license
“[T]he function of the reviewing court ends when an error of law is laid bare. At that point the matter once more goes to the [agency] for reconsideration”
“[T]he function of the reviewing court ends when an error of law is laid bare. At that point the matter once more goes to the Commission for reconsideration.”
“[T]he function of the reviewing court ends when an error of law is laid bare. At that point the matter once more goes to the [Agency] for reconsideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

180 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Sanford v. Kepner

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.