· 4/11/1907
Sandy River Cannel Coal Co. v. White House Cannel Coal Co.
Citations
- 125 Ky. 278
- 101 S.W. 319
- 1907 Ky. LEXIS 284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that non-signatory defendant could enforce arbitration agreement because plaintiff’s own pleadings referred to defendant as an agent of the signatory
- finding that the language “in connection with” is “broad and unambiguous, encompassing any dispute that has a ‘logical or casual connection’ to the . . . contracts” (quoting John Wyeth & Bro. Ltd. V. CIGNA Intern. Corp., 119 F.3d 1070, 1074 (3d Cir. 1997)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.