Skip to main content
· 4/11/1907

Sandy River Cannel Coal Co. v. White House Cannel Coal Co.

Citations

  • 125 Ky. 278
  • 101 S.W. 319
  • 1907 Ky. LEXIS 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that non-signatory defendant could enforce arbitration agreement because plaintiff’s own pleadings referred to defendant as an agent of the signatory
  • finding that the language “in connection with” is “broad and unambiguous, encompassing any dispute that has a ‘logical or casual connection’ to the . . . contracts” (quoting John Wyeth & Bro. Ltd. V. CIGNA Intern. Corp., 119 F.3d 1070, 1074 (3d Cir. 1997)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.