Skip to main content
· 10/26/1994

Sandy Creek Condominium Ass'n v. Stolt & Egner, Inc.

Citations

  • 642 N.E.2d 171
  • 267 Ill. App. 3d 291
  • 204 Ill. Dec. 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating condominium association had standing to bring fraud claim even though all units were not affected by allegedly fraudulent statements pursuant to statute authorizing it to act in representative capacity in relation to matters involving the common elements or more than one unit
  • board, rather than unit owners, had standing, even though “not all unit owners were affected”
  • condominium association had standing to sue developer for fraudulently misrepresenting to unit owners that the buildings as a whole were generally free of defects and constructed in substantial compliance with the condominium plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peccarelli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.