· 7/10/1989
Sandusky v. First National Bank
Citations
- 299 Ark. 465
- 773 S.W.2d 95
- 1989 Ark. LEXIS 352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that parties’ conflicting affidavits presented an issue of fact such that trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment
- reversing trial court’s grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor because genuine issues of fact remained and created a jury issue as to the meaning of ambiguous terms in real estate contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dudley, Newbern, Purtle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.