Skip to main content
· 7/10/1989

Sandusky v. First National Bank

Citations

  • 299 Ark. 465
  • 773 S.W.2d 95
  • 1989 Ark. LEXIS 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that parties’ conflicting affidavits presented an issue of fact such that trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment
  • reversing trial court’s grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor because genuine issues of fact remained and created a jury issue as to the meaning of ambiguous terms in real estate contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Newbern, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.