Sandstrom v. Sandstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court may enter such an injunction “whether a spouse is attempting to dissipate marital assets before or after the final dissolution judgment”
• holding that trial courts, pursuant to § 61.11, Fla.Stat. (1989
• court may issue injunction to prevent dissipation of marital assets either before or after final dissolution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Neal v. Neal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-03· cited 17×
• Stefanowitz v. Stefanowitz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-23· cited 15×
• Gooding v. Gooding
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-01· cited 10×
• Widom v. Widom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-11· cited 9×
• Heslop v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-20· cited 8×
• Lagstrom v. Lagstrom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-15· cited 8×
• Woodrum v. Woodrum
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-24· cited 7×
• Monas v. Monas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-27· cited 4×
• Lerner v. Dum
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-21· cited 1×
• Davis v. Davis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-23· cited 1×
• Badour v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-26
• Leonard v. Leonard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-23
• Tuerk v. Tuerk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-09
• Oxenberg v. Oxenberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-19