Sandrini v. Branch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A contract is supported by a sufficient consideration if there is some benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee regardless of the amount of the benefit or detriment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gavina v. Smith
  California Supreme Court· 1944-12-28· cited 48×
• Payne v. Callahan
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-02-28· cited 16×
• Kent v. First Trust & Savings Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1950-12-22· cited 14×
• Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-10-03· cited 11×
• Alexander v. Oates
  California Court of Appeal· 1950-11-01· cited 7×
• Swigert v. Stafford
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-05-14· cited 7×
• CRV Imperial-Worthington, LP v. Gemini Insurance
  S.D. California· 2010-10-29· cited 5×
• Romero v. Brewer
  California Court of Appeal· 1943-05-25· cited 4×
• Bowman v. Union Trust Co. of San Diego
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-11-06· cited 4×
• Dos Pueblos Ranch & Improvement Co. v. Ellis
  California Court of Appeal· 1941-04-17· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Scheel v. Harr
  California Court of Appeal· 1938-06-28· cited 18×
• Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1939-05-18· cited 16×
• Brownfield v. McFadden
  California Court of Appeal· 1937-05-27· cited 8×