Sandra T.E. v. Grindle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[I]t is one thing to require prosecu- 4 The cases cited by the majority in support of its \affirmative misrepre- sentation\ theory all involve prosecutorial actions directly related to the plea process. Ferrara v. United States
• \[I]t is one thing to require prosecu- 4 The cases cited by the majority in support of its \affirmative misrepre- sentation\ theory all involve prosecutorial actions directly related to the plea process. Ferrara v. United States
• \ 'The test of the finality of a decree sufficient to support an appeal is that it ascertains and declares the rights of the parties(quoting Carter v. Mitchell
• concluding that jury could infer intent to discriminate from principal's failure to attempt to stop harassment and by her downplaying harassment
• concluding that jury could properly infer discriminatory intent from principal’s downplaying of and failure to stop harassment
• recognizing that it was clearly established “that a supervisor could be held liable for participating in or deliberately turning a blind eye to the equal protection violation of her subordinate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).