Sandra Ruffin Catherine Ruffin, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, C. Timothy Williford v. Shaw Industries, Incorporated Sherwin-Williams Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirements of both actions are nearly alike and that a finding on one claim often “applies equally” to the other
• determining that proffered expert opinion testimony was not admissible because it did not meet all the Daubert factors
• excluding scientist's test results as unreliable where, among other things, plaintiffs could not show that her methodology had been independently replicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).