Sandra Maiden v. Federal National Mortgage Association.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding section 116.110 unconstitutional to the extent it allowed signatures to be withdrawn from a petition already submitted
• holding a statute unconstitutional because it “interfere[d] with and impede[d] the initiative power”
• “This appeal was expedited for hearing …, after which the Court issued its order, with opinion to follow, which reversed the trial court’s judgment and directed the Secretary of State to place the initiative proposition on the … ballot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).