SANDRA LEFTWICH v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP AND THOMAS SCHOENDORF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the restoration order was not unduly burdensome where it “would not require capital investment disproportionate to [the employer’s] resources or impose substantial, continuing losses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).