Sandra Jarrett, - Appellee/ Cross v. Erc Properties, Inc., - Appellant/ Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had a cause of action because she was fired because she reported but could not conclusively prove that her supervisor manipulated the waiting list for federally subsidized apartments
• explaining that 5 This evidence is important because “employees who spend more than 50 percent of their time performing exempt work will generally satisfy the primary duty requirement.” 29 C.F.R. § 541.700(b
• noting that no evidence was presented to overcome the presumption
• noting employer's difficulty in mounting a good-faith defense where the same employer was found to have willfully violated provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act
• upholding jury determination of willfulness where the plaintiff’s immediate supervisors instructed her not to record overtime, in contradiction of the employer’s written policy that she would be paid overtime in accordance with the law
• “Disputes regarding the nature of an employee’s duties are questions of fact . . . .” (citing Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington, 475 U.S. 709, 714 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).