· 4/9/1999
Sandra J. MANICCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry D. BROWN, Sheriff of Santa Rosa County, Florida, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 171 F.3d 1364
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6375
- 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,855
- 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 901
- 1999 WL 198668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a female plaintiff who committed at least four policy violations was not similarly situated to employees who each committed a single policy violation
- holding that gaps of fifteen and twenty-one months between the employee’s and employer’s respective actions were too great to support a causal nexus
- holding that fifteen months and twenty-one months between the protected activity and the adverse actions were too long to demonstrate causation
- holding that the “quantity and the quality of the comparator’s misconduct must be nearly identical”
- concluding that the plaintiff failed to identify a similarly situated employee when her proposed comparators had each committed only a single act of misconduct whereas she had committed at least four policy violations
- holding that a female employee was not similarly situated to three male employees because, inter alia, the male employees were involved in only a single incident of alleged misconduct, while the female employee committed “at least four policy violations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Black, Restani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.