· 11/18/1987
Sandra J. Knudson v. City of Ellensburg, Lawrence M. Loveless and Jane Doe Loveless, and the Marital Community Composed Thereof
Citations
- 832 F.2d 1142
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that in a procedural due process case 11 a court must first determine whether a liberty or property interest exists entitling the individual to 12 due process
- equating a regular pension with a disability benefit, and noting that once a disability benefit vested, the recipient “is entitled under [state] law to receive the benefit”
- denial of a required pre-termination hearing is always actionable, even where an adequate post-deprivation hearing was provided and even where the deprivation itself was justified
- denial of a required pre-termination hearing is always actionable, even where an adequate post-deprivation hearing was provided and even where the deprivation itself was justified
- upon disability, the right to receive medical disability benefits vests, and plaintiff's interest in those benefits is a constitutionally protected property interest.
- “necessity of quick action may justify” existing procedures
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farris, Alarcon, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.