Sandra Gilbert v. Patrick Donahoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a case and should dismiss it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) when the parties’ dispute is subject to binding arbitration”
• recognizing that “a district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a case and should dismiss it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) when the parties' dispute is subject to binding arbitration”
• holding that the plaintiff’s retirement destroyed her standing to bring claims for injunctive relief because she did not face a realistic threat that the defendant’s employees would continue to violate her rights under the FMLA
• explaining that we may affirm on any ground supported by the record
• explaining that we may affirm on any ground supported by the record
• finding, in a case decided before Spizzirri, that a court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and should dismiss when the parties’ dispute is the subject of binding arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).