Sandra Gartman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that records submitted to and considered by the Appeals Council in their denial of review must be considered in the district court’s decision
• explaining that the court could not discern whether the AC considered the additional evidence and remanding
• ordering a remand to the ALJ where the record did not clearly indicate whether the Appeals Council considered new and material evidence that was submitted after the ALJ's decision
• remanding case with improperly overlooked new, material, timely information directly to ALJ
• remanding case with improperly overlooked new, material, timely information directly to ALJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).