Skip to main content
· 1/11/2016

Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction Corp

Citations

  • 809 F.3d 780
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 366
  • 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,475
  • 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 970
  • 2016 WL 106159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prima facie case is an evidentiary standard, not a “proper measure of whether a complaint fails to state a claim” (citation omitted)
  • recognizing that claims brought under Title VII and the PHRA “are governed by essentially the same legal standards”
  • holding that plaintiff’s complaint alleged conclusions—not facts—when stating that she “was sexually harassed”
  • holding that Title VII and the PHRA are assessed under the same standards
  • noting that an “allegation is conclusory and unworthy of weight in analyzing the sufficiency of a complaint [when] it embodies a legal point”
  • explaining that sex discrimination claims under both Title VII and the PHRA “are governed by essentially the same legal standards”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Chagares, Jordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.