· 1/11/2016
Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction Corp
Citations
- 809 F.3d 780
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 366
- 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,475
- 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 970
- 2016 WL 106159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prima facie case is an evidentiary standard, not a “proper measure of whether a complaint fails to state a claim” (citation omitted)
- recognizing that claims brought under Title VII and the PHRA “are governed by essentially the same legal standards”
- holding that plaintiff’s complaint alleged conclusions—not facts—when stating that she “was sexually harassed”
- holding that Title VII and the PHRA are assessed under the same standards
- noting that an “allegation is conclusory and unworthy of weight in analyzing the sufficiency of a complaint [when] it embodies a legal point”
- explaining that sex discrimination claims under both Title VII and the PHRA “are governed by essentially the same legal standards”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fisher, Chagares, Jordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.