Sandoval v. Super. Ct.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that all a claimant must do to satisfy the presentment requirement is to “specifically present[ ] the claim that his benefits should not be terminated”
• finding class members completion of questionnaire before SSA’s termination decision indicating in writing that they remained disabled and desired benefits satisfied presentment requirement
• Stevens, J., dissenting in part from memorandum decision denying application to vacate stay
• memorandum opinion denying application to vacate a stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).