Skip to main content
· 3/30/2009

Sandoval v. City of Chicago, Illinois

Citations

  • 560 F.3d 703
  • 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2085
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6863
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,517
  • 2009 WL 804665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “§ 4323(i) defines ‘private employer’ to include a subdivision of a state for the purpose of § 4323. [ ] Chicago is a ‘political subdivision’ of Illinois, and subject-matter jurisdiction is established.”
  • “A requirement of equal treatment is incompatible with a demand for preferential treatment.”
  • “accommodation ... is fundamentally different from an 20 equal-treatment norm”
  • “Section 10 4311(a) . . . “does not require accommodation”
  • “[Section] 4311 is an anti- discrimination rule.”
  • “[Section] 4311 is an anti-discrimination rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.