Sandlin v. Roche Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court was without jurisdiction to consider an employment discrimination case where plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies
• noting the court “must protect the requirement of exhaustion” and dismissing where the plaintiff cut short the administrative process to continue with court proceedings
• dismissing for failure to exhaust, even though the statutes governing the complaint procedure said that a person “may file a complaint” and “may petition for reconsideration”
• remanding with directions to dismiss without prejudice so petitioner could exhaust administrative remedies
• “The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies dictates that a remedy before an administrative agency provided by law must be sought and completed before courts will act.”
• “More recent case law regarding the KAAD has consistently noted that an independent civil action under the KAAD can only be filed once administrative remedies have been exhausted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).