Sandifer Motors, Inc. v. City of Roeland Park

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where allegations of negligence give rise to a claim for nuisance, Kansas courts apply “the rules applicable to negligence”
• holding it was proper for the jury to allocate responsibility for landowner’s damages as between city and landowner where evidence only showed that the city’s conduct created a condition posing an undue risk of harm and not that it had intended to damage the plaintiff
• flood nuisance case, stating that “where tort liability is predicated on conduct less culpable than ‘intentional,’ the general rule is to compare fault and causation.”
• affirming verdict that allocated fault to unknown third parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).