Sandidge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “arrest me” and “damn” were not fighting words and listing other Georgia cases that did involve fighting words under Chaplinsky
• holding that \arrest me\ and \damn\ were not fighting words and listing other Georgia cases that did involve fighting words under Chaplinsky
• holding that “arrest me” and “damn” were not fighting words and listing other Georgia cases that did involve fighting words under Chaplinsky
• “While the circumstances surrounding the words can be crucial, circumstances cannot change harmless words into ‘fighting words.’ ” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• defendant’s words “Arrest me” and “Damn, I’m calling corporate office” were insufficient under the circumstances to sustain a conviction for fighting words disorderly conduct conviction
• reversing conviction under OCGA § 16-11-39 (a) (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).