Sandford v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Pass. Ry.
Citations
- 153 Pa. 300
- 25 A. 833
- 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1096
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Infants—Street railways.</p> <p>In an action against a street railway company for personal injuries to a boy eight years old, the case is properly submitted to a jury where there is evidence that the boy was upon the front platform of a car, and while there a dispute arose between him and the conductor about a transfer ticket, that the conductor approached the boy in such a manner as to frighten him, and that he jumped off the ear by reason thereof, and was injured.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that since the insurer only cited the factual reason without a permissible statutory reason, the policy termination violated the Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deán, Green, Here, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxsqn, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.