Sanderson v. Lawrence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• In circumstances where “an insurance policy explicitly defines the disputed term, then we apply that definition.”
• In circumstances where “an insurance policy explicitly defines the disputed term, then we apply that definition.”
• “If the term has a plain meaning, we will apply that meaning and our analysis is complete.”
• “ ‘A term is ambiguous * * * only if two or more plausible interpretations of that term withstand scrutiny, i.e., continue[ ] to be reasonable.’ ” (quot- ing Hoffman Construction Co. v. Fred S. James & Co., 313 Or 464, 470, 836 P2d 703 (1992
• “ ‘A term is ambiguous * * * only if two or more plausible interpretations of that term withstand scrutiny, i.e., continue[ ] to be reasonable.’ ” (quot- ing Hoffman Construction Co. v. Fred S. James & Co., 313 Or 464, 470, 836 P2d 703 (1992) (emphasis in Hoffman; brackets in Coelsch

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).