Utah Supreme Court· 12/8/1992
Sanderson v. First Security Leasing Co.
Citations
- 844 P.2d 303
- 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 154
- 201 Utah Adv. Rep. 18
- 1992 Utah LEXIS 104
- 1992 WL 365811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that summary judgment on an issue that is normally a question of fact is appropriate where no reasonable jury could conclude that fact exists
- stating that it is appropriate for a court to grant summary judgment on an issue that is normally a question of fact when no reasonable jury could conclude that fact exists
- stating that \summary judgment is a question of law\ reviewed for correctness
- finding oral statement that \the job would be there\ when employee recovered from his illness was a clear manifestation of intent not to terminate
- at-will employment is bundle of different privileges, any of which employer can surrender through oral agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol CorporationTenth Circuit· 1994-12-12· cited 249×
- James v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Tenth Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 110×
- Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court· 2008-10-03· cited 85×
- Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1998-08-18· cited 77×
- Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court· 2010-04-23· cited 64×
- Trembly v. Mrs. Fields CookiesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-11-10· cited 42×
- Olympus Hills Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-12-29· cited 40×
- James v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 35×
- Balmer v. Elan Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-07-12· cited 32×
- Uhrhahn Construction & Design, Inc. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-02-22· cited 21×
- Lopez v. KlineNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-11-26· cited 20×
- Sorenson v. Kennecott Utah Copper Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-11· cited 19×
- Eldridge v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-07-12· cited 14×
- Evans v. GTE Health Systems Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-08-03· cited 12×
- Knight v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-04-11· cited 11×
- Kirberg v. West One BankCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-01· cited 10×
- Seare v. University of Utah School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-09-15· cited 9×
- Green v. StansfieldCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-12-01· cited 9×
- Dubois v. Grand CentralCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-13· cited 8×
- Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-05-17· cited 8×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court· 1985-06-12· cited 246×
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-03-20· cited 181×
- Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 167×
- Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 121×
- Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court· 1991-06-05· cited 95×
- Ward v. Richfield CityUtah Supreme Court· 1990-10-03· cited 68×
- Heslop v. Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court· 1992-09-04· cited 62×
- Landes v. Capital City BankUtah Supreme Court· 1990-07-10· cited 60×
- Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court· 1992-01-17· cited 43×
- Utah State Coalition of Senior Citizens v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 37×
- Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court· 1992-04-28· cited 36×
- Lowe v. Sorenson Research Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-08-09· cited 32×
- Caldwell v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-07-31· cited 27×
- Loose v. Nature-All Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-11-27· cited 10×
- Pankow v. Westamerica Mortgage Co.N.D. Illinois· 1990-05-08· cited 9×
- Arnold v. B.J. Titan Services Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-11-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.