Sanderson v. Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the district court “possesses broad discretion in determining whether disqualification is required in a particular case.... ”
• Law firm permitted to represent plaintiff in civil action even though it continued to represent a non-party corporation which owned 20% of defendant corporation and elected 40% of defendant’s board of directors in matters unrelated to the suit.
• motion to disqualify plaintiff’s law firm denied but law firm’s representation of non-party touching upon the subject matter of litigation ordered curtailed where non-party corporation owned 20% of the stock and appointed 40% of the Board of Directors of defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).