Sanders v. State
Citations
- 73 Miss. 444
Syllabus
<p>Prosecuting Attorney. Improper rema/rlt,s. Failure of accused to testify. Code 1892, 1 1741.</p> <p>Where, in his arg-umeut before the jury, the prosecuting- attorney violates $ 1741, code 1892, and comments on the failure of the accused to testify, a verdict of conviction will be set aside, although the court promptly rebuked counsel, and instructed the jury to disregard the fact alluded to, and counsel thereupon asked that the remark be considered as withdrawn.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant did not explain away state's incriminating evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Livingston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 95×
- Monroe v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-09-09· cited 60×
- Wright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 35×
- Peterson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-03-29· cited 29×
- Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-01-10· cited 25×
- Gurley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1911-10-15· cited 23×
- Prince v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1908-10-15· cited 20×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1907-03-15· cited 12×
- Willie Joe Wright v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2005-05-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.