Sanders v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The State [conceded] error on the part of the trial judge.. .. Obviously, we are not bound by the State’s concession, which is evidently predicated on a different perception of the record.”
• it is only necessary to show “some impairment of memory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-09· cited 21×
• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-07-02· cited 19×
• Bloodsworth v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-08· cited 12×
• Coley v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-20· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Tichnell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
• Wilhelm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
• Von Lusch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-31· cited 92×
• Kinsey v. State of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1937-03-08· cited 67×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-07-08· cited 63×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-26· cited 51×
• Mouzone v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-02· cited 25×
• Lyles v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-22· cited 24×
• Askins v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-12-21· cited 12×
• Rivenbark v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-16· cited 11×
• EDWARD AND PERSON v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-04· cited 4×