Skip to main content

Sanders v. State

Citations

  • 74 So. 3d 561
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17855
  • 2011 WL 5416341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where double jeopardy was implicated and it was impossible to tell from the verdict form if the jury found two distinct acts, the verdict must be read in a manner that would give the benefit of the doubt to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torpy, Lawson, Evander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.