Sanders v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “well-settled” rule that “where the principle is confined in jail or the penitentiary by virtue of a commitment from the same court or another court in the State at the time his bond is forfeited, such confinement exonerates both the principle and his sureties,” citing Woods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-01· cited 29×
• Queen v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-08-20· cited 28×
• Hill v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-05-08· cited 11×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-15· cited 9×
• Dominguiz v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-12-04· cited 7×
• State v. Erickson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-12-05· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Gomez
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-01-11· cited 2×
• Ron Hill v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-04-17