Skip to main content

Sanders v. State

Citations

  • 605 S.W.2d 612
  • 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the definition of “abduct” does not require that the victim be held any certain length of time
  • holding that the definition of A abduct @ does not require that the victim be held any certain length of time
  • holding that driving victim around in car on city streets for an hour sufficient evidence of secreting and holding victim in place not likely to be found
  • holding that driving victim around in car on city streets for an hour sufficient evidence of secreting and holding victim in place not likely to be found
  • observing that “[a]bduction . . . is a continuing offense, “[t]he restraint in abduction does not necessarily ‘occur’ only at one specific time,” and that “[t]here is no time limit for abduction”
  • automobile being driven on city streets may be used to restrain victim with intent to prevent liberation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Odom, Dally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.