Sanders v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \circumstantial evidence must be so strong and convincing as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except the defendants' guilt and must exclude any reasonable hypothesis of the defendants' innocence\
• state's evidence deemed insufficient to establish that defendant pickpocketed the victim; robbery conviction reversed
• \circumstantial evidence must be so strong and convincing as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except the defendants' guilt and must exclude any reasonable hypothesis of the defendants' innocence\
• “circumstantial evidence must be so strong and convincing as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except the defendants’ guilt and must exclude any reasonable hypothesis of the defendants’ innocence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McArthur v. Nourse
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-03-29· cited 27×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-26· cited 24×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-30· cited 8×
• Alleyne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-01· cited 4×
• Remor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-17· cited 3×
• Woods v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-03· cited 1×
• N. S. L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-14

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-03-28· cited 11×