Skip to main content
· 10/31/1994

Sanders v. Ryles

Citations

  • 318 Ark. 418
  • 885 S.W.2d 888
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Our review of these deficiencies of performance shows these to be good faith errors in judgment that under the statute do not constitute ‘misconduct.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.