New Mexico Supreme Court· 12/11/1989

Sanders v. Lutz

Citations

784 P.2d 12
109 N.M. 193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that an “easement should be construed according to its express and specific terms as a manifestation of the intent of the parties”
providing that an “easement should be construed according to its express and specific terms as a manifestation of the intent of the parties”
affirming trial court revision of easement intended to be used as roadway by rounding off sharp, square corners of easement
to recover, must show conduct was “ ‘beyond all possible bounds of decency * * * and utterly intolerable’ ”
to recover, must show conduct was \`beyond all possible bounds of decency * * * and utterly intolerable'\
“In the present case . . . the instrument is ambiguous [and as a result, we] hold that the trial court properly acted . . . by determining the intent of the parties and revising the written instrument accordingly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Montgomery, Ransom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.