Sanders v. Lutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that an “easement should be construed according to its express and specific terms as a manifestation of the intent of the parties”
• providing that an “easement should be construed according to its express and specific terms as a manifestation of the intent of the parties”
• affirming trial court revision of easement intended to be used as roadway by rounding off sharp, square corners of easement
• to recover, must show conduct was “ ‘beyond all possible bounds of decency * * * and utterly intolerable’ ”
• to recover, must show conduct was \`beyond all possible bounds of decency * * * and utterly intolerable'\
• “In the present case . . . the instrument is ambiguous [and as a result, we] hold that the trial court properly acted . . . by determining the intent of the parties and revising the written instrument accordingly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).