Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 12/2/1960
Sanders v. Loyd
Citations
- 51 Tenn. App. 49
- 364 S.W.2d 369
- 1960 Tenn. App. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the issuance of a mandate by an appellate court reinvests the trial court with jurisdiction over a case
- “It is the rule that a mandate or an order of remand is necessary to reinvest the lower court with jurisdiction to proceed with the case.”
- “It is the rule that a mandate or an order of remand is necessary to reinvest the lower court with jurisdiction to proceed with the case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hickerson, Humphreys, Shriver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hannah Ann Culbertson v. Randall Eric CulbertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2014-04-30· cited 43×
- Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-07-26· cited 23×
- Chambers v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1975-02-28· cited 3×
- Cooper v. RossonTennessee Supreme Court· 1974-05-06· cited 2×
- John Moyers v. Sheun Lai Poon and Brenda Lee PoonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-03-09· cited 1×
- Mary Hall v. Mary Rose PippinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-12-15
- Tray Simmons v. Dr. Shahidul IslamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2026-05-21
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- C.E. McCune Co. v. WarndorfOhio Court of Appeals· 1936-06-16· cited 30×
- Watkins v. DunbarIllinois Supreme Court· 1925-06-18· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. Fawcett v. BOARD OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERSWyoming Supreme Court· 1954-07-13· cited 28×
- Love v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-11-13· cited 22×
- Farnum v. BradyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1929-10-08· cited 19×
- Klein v. Vernon Lumber Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1945-03-23· cited 14×
- Chumbley v. Duck River Electric Membership Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1958-02-06· cited 8×
- Miller v. Ferrocarrill del Pacifico de NicaraguaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1941-03-04· cited 7×
- Parker v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-01-09· cited 5×
- Dulion v. S. A. Lynch Enterprise Finance Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1931-11-19· cited 5×
- Robinson v. JacksonPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1936-10-20· cited 5×
- Klepper v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Supreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 4×
- Ellison v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1938-03-09· cited 4×
- Strawn v. County of SarpyNebraska Supreme Court· 1953-04-10· cited 3×
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1928-10-02· cited 3×
- Vukmirovich v. BrajeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1938-03-21· cited 3×
- Winn, Admr. v. McCoy, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 1941-06-16· cited 1×
- Lawrenceville Township High School District No. 71 v. St. Francisville Community High School District No. 102Appellate Court of Illinois· 1947-10-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.