Sanders v. Esqueda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a mark owner sufficiently \rebut[ted] [a] prima facie case of abandonment\ because it continued advertising the mark during the period of nonuse, among other activities expressing an intent to resume use
• considering evidence beyond a statutory period to affirm the Board’s decision to sustain opposition to a trademark application
• “Although Oland & Son’s registration was cancelled in January of 1968 for failure to file a continued use affidavit, this, in and of itself, does not show an intent to abandon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).