Sanders v. Ditch
Citations
- 110 La. 884
- 34 So. 860
- 1903 La. LEXIS 724
Syllabus
<p>TRESPASS — LITIGIOUS RIGHTS — PURCHASE-EFFECT.</p> <p>1. A person who enters upon the land of another, and appropriates the timber thereon, under circumstances justifying the conclusion that, if he did not know that he was without right so-to do, it was because he did no-t choose to know it, is a mere trespasser and depredator, and is-liable in damages.</p> <p>2. “A right is said to be litigious whenever there exists a suit and contestation on the same.” This is the controlling definition of the-law of this state upon the subject, and it is applicable as well to the public officers mentioned: in Civ. Code, art. 2447, as to other persons.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the Attorney General is without authority to “impose the notice and access conditions”
- finding that the plaintiffs had “demonstrated Article III standing to challenge the conditions” and that their claims were “ripe for review”
- noting that all of the conditions preceding it apply to the grant itself
- noting that all of the conditions preceding it apply to the grant itself
- noting that all of the conditions preceding it apply to the grant itself
- noting that all of the conditions preceding it apply to the grant itself
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.