Skip to main content

Sanders v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 339 S.W.3d 427
  • 2011 Ky. LEXIS 82
  • 2011 WL 2084138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that CR 60.02 allows appeals based upon claims of error that “were unknown and could not have 5 CR 60.02(b
  • holding that CR -10- 60.02 allows appeals based upon claims of error that “were unknown and could not have been known to the moving party by exercise of reasonable diligence and in time to have been otherwise presented to the court”
  • noting that “claims . . . of the . . . ineffective assistance of counsel variety . . . do not implicate the extraordinary sort of claim contemplated under CR 60.02(f)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Venters, Abramson, Cunningham, Noble, Schroder, Scott, Minton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.