Skip to main content
· 5/5/2004

Sanders v. CNA Group Life Assurance Co.

Citations

  • 322 F. Supp. 2d 1142
  • 22 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 779
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1311
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11348
  • 2004 WL 1012911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the doctrine does not apply to a court’s abuse of discretion review of an ERISA plan’s determination but it does apply to a de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.