Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Federal Circuit in Amdahl granted implied-in-law contract relief while calling it implied-in-fact relief
• conferring a benefit on the government held not enough to establish privity
• “[T]he recovery to which Amdahl refers would have to be under a contract implied-in-law _”
• “Implied-in-fact contracts require the same contractual elements as are required to establish an express contract, i.e., mutuality of intent, offer and acceptance, consideration, and lack of ambiguity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).