Sandefur v. Stevens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice of newspaper articles “not . . . for the truth of their assertions,” but “for the fact that they . . . should have put plaintiff on notice of [their contents]” (citing Washington Post v. Robinson, 935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991
• applying similar reasoning on motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).