Sancho v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ballot summary accurately described the proposed amendment and noting that the summary included a copy of the full text of the amendment
• explaining that a party “not adversely affected by a statute generally has no standing to argue that the statute is invalid.”
• stating that “[constitutional rights are personal,” such that generally, “[a] party who is not adversely affected by a statute ... has no standing to argue that the statute is invalid”
• “The effect of this change in the statute is to exempt the Florida Legislature from the 75-word limit applicable to a ballot summary for an amendment by citizen initiative or by another authorized method of amending the constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).