Skip to main content
· 9/19/2012

Sanchez v. Vilsack

Citations

  • 695 F.3d 1174
  • 26 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1540
  • 2012 WL 4096250
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an affidavit resting on personal knowledge and setting forth admissible facts “is legally competent to oppose summary judgment, irrespective of its self-serving nature”
  • emphasizing that there was no evidence in Rascon that he could not perform the essential functions of his position
  • remanding to district court after reversing summary judgment on question of whether plaintiff was disabled
  • remanding to district court after reversing summary judgment on question of whether plaintiff was disabled
  • evaluating a Rehabilitation Act claim under the same standards as under the ADA
  • accommodation “is not per se unreasonable, even if an employee is able to perform the essential functions of her job without it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Holloway, Matheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.