Skip to main content
· 7/21/1953

Sanchez v. Steele

Citations

  • 114 F. Supp. 127
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the presence of a protective order lessened concerns about the foreign government’s interest in maintaining secrecy over the disclosed materials
  • adopting the RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW (Third Restatement) § 442(1)(c
  • adopting the RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW (Third Restatement) § 442(1)(c
  • noting “a ‘general objection’ is not sufficient”
  • noting “a ‘general objection’ is not sufficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reeves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.