Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/14/2011
Sanchez v. State
Citations
- 354 S.W.3d 476
- 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1670
- 2011 WL 6183607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an article 38.072 hearing is for the trial court to determine reliability based on time, content, and circumstances
- explaining that the credibility of the outcry witness is not a relevant issue at an article 38.072 hearing
- holding complainant’s statement defendant “picked her up, took her into the other room and . . . put his penis in her” admissible under article 38.072
- holding complainant’s statement defendant “picked her up, took her into the other room and . . . put his penis in her” admissible under article 38.072
- discussing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 38.072 (West. Sup. 2012)
- \An outcry witness may testify . . . about the victim's out-of-court description of the offense.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Womack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
161 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bays, Michael JayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-04-17· cited 88×
- Raymond Merril Jessop v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-04-19· cited 81×
- John Cruz Buentello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-12-08· cited 42×
- Theresa Garcia Infante v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-12-28· cited 38×
- James Larry Merrit v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-07-25· cited 31×
- Zack Eldred, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-03-05· cited 29×
- Juan Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-08-29· cited 20×
- Brian Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-14· cited 16×
- State v. Daniel VillegasTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2016-12-21· cited 15×
- Javier Noel Campos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-16· cited 14×
- Eloy Jiovanni Perez Alcala v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-11-14· cited 12×
- Nassouri v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-05-16· cited 8×
- In re P.M.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2018-01-12· cited 3×
- Ivan William Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-08-01· cited 2×
- Charles Edward Pair, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-11-13
- Alejandro Munoz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-11-14
- Armando Rodriguez Zuniga v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-06-10
- Derek Renee Sosa v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-06-29
- Jesus Villalobos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-08-28
- Rockwell, Kwame A. AKA Rockwell, Kwane A.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-12-11
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- People v. FrySupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-06-28· cited 293×
- Coffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-10-12· cited 278×
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-14· cited 82×
- Buckley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-21· cited 67×
- Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-12· cited 58×
- State v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court· 2005-04-21· cited 47×
- Broderick v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-10-03· cited 36×
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-09-10· cited 29×
- Alamo National Bank of San Antonio v. HurdCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1972-09-13· cited 24×
- MacGilfrey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2001-08-29· cited 16×
- Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-03-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.