Sanchez v. Sanchez
Citations
- 21 Fla. 346
Syllabus
<p>1. Alimony is defined, in its legal sense, to be that proportion of the husband’s estate which is judicially allowed and allotted to a wife for her sustenance and livelihood during the period of their separation. Where a prima facie cause of action, or defence in divorce, appears, upon proper application the court will ordinarily grant such alimony and money for the expenses of the suit, not as of strict right in the wife, but as of sound judicial discretion.</p> <p>2. In proceedings taken by the wife in an action by the husband for alimony and suit money, the husband should have due notice of the time and place of such application to the court, and an 0 pportunity to oppose, and the record should show that such was the case.</p> <p>3. The record affirmatively shows, that while the proceedings for such order of allowance were taken before the Judge of the Fourth Circuit, who is alleged to have appointed a master, the cause being pending in the Fifth Circuit, it nowhere appears how; when,, or by what means the Judge of the Fourth Circuit obtained ju-f risdiction. Nor does the name of such master appear in the record ; Held, That the record should affirmatively show that the-jurisdiction of the Judge of the Fourth Circuit was acquired in. compliance with Chapter 373, Laws 1851.</p> <p>4. An order for alimony and suit money made on the application of the> wife, where it does not appear by the record that the husband-was duly notified of the motion, and had an opportunity of. op-posing, will be set aside.</p> <p>5. All subsequent proceedings in such case, based upon such order so. illegally made, as an order for an attachment as for contempt in not complying therewith, are void .and of no effect.</p>
Judges: Yanyalkenburgh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1925-12-16· cited 30×
- Dykes v. DykesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-07-10· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Byrd v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-11-17· cited 13×
- Ex parte BevilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 13×
- Haddon v. HaddonSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 11×
- Sandstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 10×
- Voss v. VossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-11-24· cited 9×
- Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 8×
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-12-10· cited 7×
- Price v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-16· cited 5×
- Puleo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-02-06· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.