Sanchez v. Rowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he holding in Carlson does not alter the plain meaning of § 2676 because Carlson did not deal with the effect of a FTCA judgment on a plaintiff’s power to continue to pursue a Bivens remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).