Sanchez v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that proceedings would not be reopened where litigant failed to receive a hearing notice because of the litigant’s “own conduct made him or her unreachable”
• interpreting 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c), the predecessor to § 1229a(b)(5)(B), and holding that the two statutes are “materially the same” and “similarly construed”
• “[A]ctual receipt of a hearing notice is not required if an alien fails to keep his or her address current with the Immigration Court.”
• “[Ajctual receipt of a hearing notice is not required if an alien fails to keep his or her. address current with the Immigration Court.”
• “[Removal] proceedings will not be reopened if the alien fails to receive a hearing notice because the alien’s own conduct made him or her unreachable . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).