Sanchez v. City of Denver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that court reviewing sufficiency challenge must “credit[ ] every inference that could have been drawn in the government’s favor” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing evidence that an otherwise dysfunctional explosive device could unintentionally detonate when exposed to “heat, shock, or friction”
• upholding a conviction even though the device lacked a piece of tape needed to connect the wires to the battery
• affirming a conviction under 26 U.S.C. 5845(f) where the destructive device required tape to be functional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).