Sanchez-Martinez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff failed to establish an exceptional case where the defendant’s contacts in the forum state did not establish a “surrogate principal place of business”
• holding interpreting registration statute as corporate consent to general jurisdiction is limited by federal due process rights
• finding that an interpretation of Connecticut’s business registration statute constituting consent to general jurisdiction “risk[ed] unravelling the jurisdictional structure envisioned in Daimler and Goodyear”
• finding that an interpretation of Connecticut’s business registration statute constituting consent to general jurisdiction “risk[ed] unravelling the jurisdictional structure envisioned in Daimler and Goodyear’
• noting that state’s ability to require consent by registration might be limited by the 14th Amendment
• expressing that Penn- sylvania Fire “has yielded to the doctrinal refinement reflected in Good- year and Daimler and the Court’s 21st century approach to general and specific jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).